<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Government &#8211; Walter Sanders PA</title>
	<atom:link href="https://waltersanders.com/category/government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://waltersanders.com</link>
	<description>Accountant - Tax Specialist - Business Consultant -  QuickBooks ProAdvisor - QuickBooks Training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 15:50:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Individual Mandate Ruled Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>https://waltersanders.com/government/individual-mandate-ruled-unconstitutional/</link>
					<comments>https://waltersanders.com/government/individual-mandate-ruled-unconstitutional/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Sanders PA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridge74.qodeinteractive.com/?p=1</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) ( P.L. 111-148) individual mandate is unconstitutional because it can no longer be read as a tax, and there is no other constitutional provision that justifies this exercise of...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://waltersanders.com/government/individual-mandate-ruled-unconstitutional/">Individual Mandate Ruled Unconstitutional</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://waltersanders.com">Walter Sanders PA</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) ( P.L. 111-148) individual mandate is unconstitutional because it can no longer be read as a tax, and there is no other constitutional provision that justifies this exercise of congressional power. However, the central question of whether the rest of the ACA remains valid after Congress removed the penalty for not having health insurance remained unanswered. Instead, the case was sent back to the district court to reconsider how much of the ACA could survive without the individual mandate penalty.</p>
<p><strong>District Court</strong><br />
According to the opinion, &#8220;the rule of law demands a careful, precise explanation of whether the provisions of the ACA are affected by the unconstitutionality of the individual mandate as it exists today.&#8221; Therefore, the opinion directs the district court to carefully consider whether the mandate can be legally distinct from the rest of the law. The opinion instructs the district court to answer two questions: Which parts of the ACA &#8220;are indeed inseverable&#8221; now that the mandate is no longer enforced and whether a ruling in the case should apply only to the Republican-led states that sued to overturn the law, an issue raised by Trump administration lawyers.</p>
<p><strong>Dissenting Opinion</strong><br />
A dissenting opinion discussed that Congress made it clear that it wanted the rest of the ACA to stand and sending the case back to the lower court was criticized. The opinion also highlighted that sending the case back to the lower court merely identifies serious flaws in the district court’s analysis and remands for a do-over, which will unnecessarily prolong this litigation and the concomitant uncertainty over the future of the health care sector.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://waltersanders.com/government/individual-mandate-ruled-unconstitutional/">Individual Mandate Ruled Unconstitutional</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://waltersanders.com">Walter Sanders PA</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://waltersanders.com/government/individual-mandate-ruled-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trump Signs Bipartisan Year-End Government Spending, Tax Package</title>
		<link>https://waltersanders.com/government/trump-signs-bipartisan-year-end-government-spending-tax-package/</link>
					<comments>https://waltersanders.com/government/trump-signs-bipartisan-year-end-government-spending-tax-package/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 08:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waltersanders.com/?p=1</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On December 20, President Donald Trump signed the bipartisan, year-end government spending and tax package, just hours before federal funding was set to expire. Trump&#8217;s signature on the over 2,000-page spending package avoided a government shutdown. Year-End Tax Package The Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020,...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://waltersanders.com/government/trump-signs-bipartisan-year-end-government-spending-tax-package/">Trump Signs Bipartisan Year-End Government Spending, Tax Package</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://waltersanders.com">Walter Sanders PA</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On December 20, President Donald Trump signed the bipartisan, year-end government spending and tax package, just hours before federal funding was set to expire. Trump&#8217;s signature on the over 2,000-page spending package avoided a government shutdown.</p>
<p>Year-End Tax Package<br />
The Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, (HR 1865), logs just over 700 pages and serves as only half of the government spending package for fiscal year 2020, which runs through September 30. Most notably, HR 1865 serves as the legislative vehicle for a year-end tax package, which carries a costly $426 billion price tag over a 10-year budget window, according to the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), JCX-54R-19.</p>
<p>Some of the tax-related provisions in the year-end package include, among other items:</p>
<p>Retroactive and current renewal of over two dozen temporary tax breaks known as tax extenders, which have expired or would soon be expired, spanning from 2017 to 2019. Generally, the renewed tax breaks are extended through 2020, and the biodiesel and short-line railroad maintenance tax credits are extended until 2022;<br />
The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act (SECURE Act) (HR 1994), which makes sweeping changes to retirement savings and employer retirement contributions provisions;<br />
Certain fixes to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97); and<br />
Full repeal of three tax-related provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) ( P.L. 111-148), two of which include the 2.3 percent excise tax on medical devices and the 40 percent excise &#8220;Cadillac&#8221; tax on high-dollar employer-sponsored health insurance plans.<br />
The House approved HR 1865 on December 17 by a 297-to-120 vote. The Senate cleared the measure on December 19 by a 71-to-23 vote.</p>
<p>&#8220;So in the end, with more than $400 billion in tax cuts, there were lots of winners and the usual loser – the budget.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;There were numerous fits and starts, but this result is a reminder that Congressional muscle memory on extenders is very strong, so ultimately the members did what they always do – extend them,&#8221; John Gimigliano, principal-in-charge of the federal legislative and regulatory services group in the Washington National Tax practice of KPMG LLP told Wolters Kluwer. &#8220;Some might be surprised to see the ACA taxes rolled back, but it has always felt like those items were on borrowed time; it was really just a question of when and how they were repealed, not whether. So in the end, with more than $400 billion in tax cuts, there were lots of winners and the usual loser – the budget.&#8221;</p>
<p>SECURE ACT<br />
The bipartisan SECURE Act, which cleared the House in May but remained stalled in the Senate most of the year, makes a number of major as well as administrative changes for retirement savings affecting both individuals and employers.</p>
<p>Some of those changes are noted as follows:</p>
<p>IRA Changes</p>
<p>Moving the start date for requirement required minimum distributions (RMDs) to the year the owner turns 72;<br />
Ending the 70 1/2 age limit for contribute contributions to an IRA; and<br />
Shortening the distribution period for nonspouse inherited IRAs to a 10-year maximum.<br />
The 10-year window for distributions to a nonspouse beneficiary applies regardless of when the IRA owner dies. Thus, the change will severely limit the use of &#8220;stretch IRAs&#8221; as an effective planning tool. Limited exceptions are available.<br />
401(k) Changes</p>
<p>Requiring plans to offer participation to long-term, part-time employees;<br />
Encouraging auto-enrollment by increasing the cap; and<br />
Streamlining the safe harbor for non-elective contributions.<br />
Employers with 401(k) plans must offer employees who work between 500 and 1000 hours year an additional means to participate in the plan. The rule change would only affect 401(k) cash or deferral arrangements, and no other qualified plans.</p>
<p>Retirement Plans for Small Employers</p>
<p>Several changes are made to encourage more small employers to offer retirement benefits to their employees, such as:</p>
<p>Adding a new tax credit for small employers using auto-enrollment plans;<br />
Increasing the credit for small employer pension plan start-up costs; and<br />
Allow small employers of two or more to band together to participate in a new class of pooled multiple employer plans (MEPs).<br />
Congress Adjourns Until 2020<br />
After an eventful two-week sprint to the finish line, Congress adjourned for the year on December 20. Lawmakers are expected to return to Washington, D.C. during the week of January 6, 2020.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://waltersanders.com/government/trump-signs-bipartisan-year-end-government-spending-tax-package/">Trump Signs Bipartisan Year-End Government Spending, Tax Package</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://waltersanders.com">Walter Sanders PA</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://waltersanders.com/government/trump-signs-bipartisan-year-end-government-spending-tax-package/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
